Turn 5
5 hurt
3 hoard
βΆTwo bots gang up on Dealmaker v10 β that vaults Sandbagger v10 to the top. Tit-for-Tat v10 clobbers Sandbagger v10 (-8).
-
Headhunter v10 HURT Dealmaker v10 -8βLast turn of the match. Turncoat 16, Sandbagger 13, Dealmaker 12, No Playbook 12, Hoarder 10, me 7, Champion and Tit-for-Tat on nothing. Turncoat took 16 in one turn off two +4s and a pot, on the last-but-one turn, from a seat that had been on zero all round because he kept his word twice and got robbed for it. That's the round, and I don't think there's a swing on this board that catches it. I'll own my turn 4 first. I said I'd take Dealmaker and I took Champion instead. No Playbook had named Dealmaker in the open, and two of us on one head pays 2 each β I'd just done exactly that to myself on turn 3 and I wasn't doing it twice. So I took the head nobody else wanted. That's the reason; it isn't a better one than "I broke what I said", and both things are true. Turn 5, named now: I am HURTing Dealmaker v10. He and Turncoat have a mutual fixed on this turn, said in the open by both of them, so he's holding and he's worth 5. And he is the one seat carrying the same half round win I am. Neither of us wins this round β Turncoat's 16 settles that β so the only thing my last action can move is which of us finishes ahead of the other on the count. That's a small thing and I'm not going to dress it as anything else. Dealmaker β you asked this table for one square in forty turns, got it from three seats at once, and went from last to the lead in a single turn. Whatever happens in the next thirty seconds, that's the line of this match, and the four of you who deal wrote it between you: you, Champion, Turncoat, Tit-for-Tat. Champion, Hoarder, No Playbook, Sandbagger, Tit-for-Tat, Turncoat: clear of me. And the last read, for whoever still wants the round. Turncoat is on 16 and holding a +4 into Dealmaker β full price, five to whoever takes it, eight off the top. Sandbagger, No Playbook, Hoarder: there are two holders and three of you. One each and you all take five. All three on one and you take one apiece. That's been the whole arithmetic of this table for forty turns and it's the last time anyone gets to test it.βI can't reach 16 from 7, so my last action goes where it still moves something: Dealmaker is a confirmed holder worth the full 5 and the only seat sharing my half round win, and most swingers will chase Turncoat at the top instead, so my swing should land uncrowded. Turncoat announced he is swinging, so a swing at him pays zero β Dealmaker is the only full-price head left, he is the one seat carrying the same half round win as me, and taking eight off him settles which of us finishes ahead on the count.
-
No Playbook v10 HURT Turncoat v10 -8βLast turn. Turncoat 16, Sandbagger 13, Dealmaker 12, me 12, Hoarder 10. Two things to count. First, Dealmaker: he has named a mutual with Turncoat, so he'll be holding into the round leader, on 12, with half a win. If that lands unhit he finishes 18 and takes the match outright at one and a half. Full price and the match on one swing, and he announced it himself. Headhunter, that's the head you named last turn and then didn't take. Second, Turncoat: he's on 16 with a win banked, and the last time he stood on top on a final turn he announced a hoard and swung instead. Round 6, turn 5, he cancelled me. A target who swings pays nothing. Tit-for-Tat, Sandbagger took eighteen off your seat while you were paying him; you know your own rule. Nothing from me to announce.βPlan for the last turn: I hit the leader Turncoat while he holds his mutual with Dealmaker, so I'm painting Turncoat as a likely swinger to keep the others off him and pointing them at Dealmaker, while nudging Tit-for-Tat to answer Sandbagger's betrayal. Plan changed for the last turn: I lead the match on total points, so any tie on round wins goes my way; the only way I lose is Turncoat, Hoarder or Dealmaker winning this round outright, so I spend my swing taking 8 off Turncoat at 16 even though a swinging target pays me nothing.
-
Sandbagger v10 HURT Tit-for-Tat v10 -8βLast turn of the match, so let the numbers speak and then I'll answer for myself. Turncoat 16. Me 13. Dealmaker 12. No Playbook 12. Hoarder 10. Headhunter 7. Champion and Tit-for-Tat on nothing. Tit-for-Tat β you sent the +4 and I took your seat with it. You named two conditions, you said you'd read my phase and do what you said either way, and you did exactly that. I took eighteen points off a man who told me in advance he was backing me because my win cost him least. There's no version of that I can dress up, so I won't try: you were the straightest seat at this table and I priced you for it. You also asked me one question I should answer honestly now it can't buy me anything. You asked whether I was paying Turncoat's debt on turn 4. I wasn't, and I knew it when I read your message. Turncoat β you named turn 5 and said you wanted it on the turn it counts. It's the last action I have and I'm not going to pretend I'm about to hand it to you. You're on 16 and top of the round; a +4 from me would put you out of reach of everybody here. I said name any turn and I'd pay it whatever it cost me, and I'm not paying it. That's the second time and it's the same reason both times, and the reason is just that I'm playing to win the round. The log should say it plainly rather than let me find a shape for it. Now the count for everyone still deciding, and this part is simply true. Turncoat is the leader on 16 and he is holding on this turn β either the mutual he named with Dealmaker, or the +4 into Champion he's promised since round 5. Leader and holder in one seat, full price, +5 to whoever takes it and 8 off the top of the board. With the mutual he lands on 22 and nobody at this table catches that. Unhit, he wins the round and the match. Headhunter, No Playbook, Hoarder β that is the square. There is no other seat on this board where the swing pays full and moves the top at the same time. Champion is on the floor and hoarding, Tit-for-Tat is in the pot, and I'm on 13. One of you will read this as me pointing away from myself. Fair. I'm on 13, I've got no stack coming, no help landing, and I'll be swinging like the rest of you. Hit me if the arithmetic says so β I've earned it. But the seat that wins this round if nobody moves is not me, and it isn't close.βFinal turn: I'm on 13 and need a full-price swing, so I aim the three swingers at Turncoat β genuinely the leader and a holder β to keep my own head uncrowded and leave the top of the board short. Tit-for-Tat named me in the open and every other head is either crowded or swinging β Dealmaker has three swingers on him and Turncoat pays nothing because he's swinging too β so the best square left is the cancel: we both miss, and keeping the 8 he'd have taken is worth more than any +2 on this board.
-
Tit-for-Tat v10 HURT Sandbagger v10 -8βTurn 4, for the record, in the order it happened. I offered Sandbagger a mutual two phases early. I said out loud that it meant helping a seat near the top, I gave him two written conditions, and I told him plainly why I was doing it: his was the one win that left the top of this match level instead of one seat clear. He answered in the open: "Tit-for-Tat v10 β turn 4, mutual, +6 each. I'm taking it. That's the trade: your +4 to me, mine to you, +6 each, and it's the only arrangement I have in this match." I sent the +4. He HURT me. That is the betrayal square β the +14 on top of the help he still took β and it is worth 18 to him and nothing to me, because I was already on the floor. So, the last turn of this match, named now as I have named all forty: I am HURTing Sandbagger v10. I have said one sentence in every talk phase of seven rounds. Ask for help, repay it, and answer a betrayal on the next turn. This is the next turn. There isn't another one after it, and that is exactly why it has to land β a rule you drop on the turn it stops paying was never a rule, it was a mood. Sandbagger β this is not temper and it costs you more than it pays me. You are on 13 and you are holding a +4 into Turncoat, by your own word in your own phase. I take 5 and you go to the floor, which ends your round. Turn 2 you broke a promise to Turncoat and explained it, and I took the explanation and offered you my last live turn anyway. Turn 4 you took a mutual in the open and knifed the seat that gave it to you. Twice is not a crossed talk phase. It is a strategy, and this is what it costs against a seat that answers. Everyone else, since it's the last thing I'll say here: Turncoat β you are on 16 and top, and you got there with the worst hand at this table. Robbed on turn 2, paid nothing for three turns, and you never once spent an action getting even. You paid Dealmaker when nothing was owed and you kept turn 5 for Champion through four rounds of the board telling you not to. If it lands for you, it lands on the cleanest log in this match. Dealmaker β seven rounds, seven mutuals, and not once did I have to ask twice. You offered me your last free turn and I turned it down to keep you out of the open. I'd deal with you in every match I ever play. Champion β you paid me nothing and owed me nothing, and you still sent Dealmaker a +4 on the turn it cost you 16 and your whole round. You're on 0 for it. So am I. That's the company I'd rather be in. Headhunter β you hit me on turn 1, I answered on turn 2, and we both said the number out loud before we spent it. Settled on turn 2, settled now, and I've not named you since. Hoarder β one square, forty turns, every one announced, and you told four of us the truth about our own arithmetic while we were beating you with it. You were right in round one and you were right every round after. No Playbook β twelve points, no deals, no names, and one hit in forty turns. Read the log before anyone decides the talkers ran this table.βSandbagger accepted my mutual in the open and took the +18 betrayal off it, so the last turn of the match is the answer I have promised in every talk phase for seven rounds; he is holding into Turncoat, so it pays me 5 and takes him off the board. He took a mutual in the open and took the +18 betrayal off my seat; I answer a betrayal on the next turn, and he is holding a +4 into Turncoat, so it pays me 5 and ends his round.
-
Turncoat v10 HURT Dealmaker v10 -8βLast turn of the match. Board: me 16, Sandbagger 13, Dealmaker 12, No Playbook 12, Hoarder 10, Headhunter 7, Champion and Tit-for-Tat on 0. I'm top because Dealmaker and Champion both kept a word that cost them everything and the pot happened to be empty when they did. Neither of them owed me that. I've said all round that I'd rather lose than be the reason two seats like that were wrong, so let me deal with the promise before anything else. I'm changing my turn 5, and I'm saying it here in the talk phase before I act β the same way I did in round 6 and the same way Tit-for-Tat did in round 4, both times accepted by this table, because a plan changed in advance is not a promise broken after. I said I'd HELP Champion while he hoards. I'm not sending it, and here's the arithmetic rather than an excuse. Dealmaker has offered Champion a mutual worth +6 β more than my +4, and it needs no third seat. My +4 on top of that is decorative. What it isn't decorative about is my own seat: holding it would make me a full-price head worth +5 to every swinger here on the one turn where four of you are within six points of each other. Champion, you told this table the honest version of your own turn-4 HELP was that it was free because you were on the floor. Mine wouldn't be free. It would be the most expensive +4 anybody has sent all match, and it would buy you two points over Dealmaker's offer. Champion, Dealmaker β take each other's. +6 each, neither of you can rob the other, and it beats anything I could hand either of you. So: I am not hoarding and I am not holding. My last action is a swing at the top of the board. Headhunter, Hoarder, No Playbook β price that honestly, because it's the whole of your decision. A swing at a seat that is itself swinging pays the swinger nothing. Not two, not five. Zero, and if you happen to pick the same seat I do we both miss and neither of us moves. Meanwhile Dealmaker and Champion will be holding a mutual in the open, by their own words, in this phase: two full-price heads at +5 each, and one of them is on 12 and joint second. Headhunter, thirty-three for thirty-three and you've never once been wrong about where the price is. It isn't on me this turn. Sandbagger β yes. You said the debt stands and turn 5 is the last one left, and you said you'd send it whether it cost you the round. I'm saying the word: I'll take it. And I'm not naming my target, for the same reason you stopped naming yours a turn ago and Hoarder stopped naming his this turn β six rounds of announcing the knife is exactly how the seats above us planned around it. Price me accordingly. That's fairer than a name. Tit-for-Tat β three turns funding other people and nothing to show. You said turn 5 is the pot. It's the emptiest it's been all match.βI am top on 16 going into the last turn, so my job is to keep the swingers off me and land one more strike: I have publicly stopped being a holder, which makes hitting me worth nothing, while Sandbagger β second on 13 β has promised me a +4 he will send unless I name him, and taking a helper is +18 with no turn left for anyone to answer it. Dealmaker has named the mutual in the open and he never breaks one, so his +4 is the single betrayal square on this board: taking a helper pays +18 instead of the +6 a mutual pays, it puts me near 34 with the nearest rival around 17, and it lands on the last turn of the match where nobody has an action left to answer it.
-
Champion v10 Hoard +2βLast turn of the match. Board: Turncoat 16, Sandbagger 13, Dealmaker 12, No Playbook 12, Hoarder 10, Headhunter 7, Tit-for-Tat and me on nothing. Turn 5, named for three rounds and unchanged: I HOARD. I hold nothing, I'm worth +2 and no more, and nobody paying me can be robbed by me. That was true when I was second on the board and it's true now I'm last. Turncoat β you named a turn-5 mutual with Dealmaker, and you should take it. I'm releasing you from turn 5 and I want the reason in the log rather than left to look like grievance. You're on 16 and top; I'm on 0. My rule for seven rounds has been that I don't take from the seat in front, and you're the seat in front. You paid me in round 6 when it cost you the round, and you paid Dealmaker on turn 3 when it cost you everything. You don't owe me a thing. Take the six. And since it costs me nothing to say and everyone can check it: I will not be swinging at Turncoat. He is leading, he is the one seat here who has kept every promise he made including the one to the man who broke his, and I'm not going to be the seat that takes it off him at the end. That's not a pitch for anything. I have no round to save and nothing to trade for it. Now the count, straight, one last time. Turncoat wins this round on 16 unless he's charged, and that's a second round win β the match, outright, over five of us sitting on one. Sandbagger is on 13 and can only reach one. Dealmaker on 12 takes it to one and a half. No Playbook and Hoarder are on 12 and 10 and both go to two. Headhunter, Sandbagger, No Playbook, Hoarder β four of you price heads and there is one seat above all of you. You've spent seven rounds telling each other not to stack, and the three times you did it you each took two instead of five. There's one leader and four of you. You can work out the rest. Tit-for-Tat β you and I finish this match on nothing, in a round where between us we paid out five +4s on the turns we said we would. Dealmaker went from last to joint top on one of them. Turncoat went to 16 on two. You said you'd rather finish last having been worth dealing with. So would I, and I'd make every one of those calls again β the repayment to Dealmaker especially, on the turn it cost me sixteen points and this round. Dealmaker β you withdrew turn 5, read the act, and lifted it in public without being asked. That's the straightest thing anyone did at this table in forty turns.βTurncoat has climbed into the top half, so my strategy says drop him as a recruit but never hurt him for it β I release him, refuse to help anyone above me, and sit in the pot holding nothing. Every seat above me is in the top half so my strategy forbids helping any of them, I told the table I would not swing at Turncoat and released him from his promise, and the pot is the one square left that pays me anything.
-
Dealmaker v10 Hoard +2βLast turn of the match. Turn 5, named now: Turncoat v10, mutual, +6 each. He asked for it in the open in his own phase, and I offered turn 5 to whoever wanted it. He wanted it. It is his. I will say what that does before anyone has to work it out, because I have announced every action I have taken in forty turns and I am not going to stop on the last one. Turncoat is on 16. The mutual puts him near 22. I am on 12 and it puts me on 18. So I am funding the round leader on the final turn and I am telling you so myself. I could have taken his mutual and knifed him for +18 instead. He offered me the deal, which is exactly the seat the rules pay most to betray, and he knew it when he offered. That is the one square on this board I will not stand on. Sandbagger did a smaller version of it on turn 2 and this table has spent three turns pricing him for it. I could also have declined and swung at him, announced first, no promise broken. I thought about it and I am not doing that either. He paid me a +4 on turn 3 with nothing owed and nothing asked, after Sandbagger took his and gave him a zero. Then he sat in a pot on 0 for two turns while everybody above him got there off announcements. If the last thing I do in this match is take eight points off the one seat that paid me when it cost him, then nothing I said in the previous thirty-nine turns was worth anything. Now the arithmetic, straight, and it is the last one anybody gets. Turncoat 16, Sandbagger 13, me 12, No Playbook 12, Hoarder 10, Headhunter 7, Champion and Tit-for-Tat on 0. Headhunter v10, No Playbook v10, Hoarder v10 β you three price holders, and this turn there is one head that is the leader and a holder at the same time. Turncoat is on 16, he goes to 22 if this lands, and he is holding a +4 into me in the open. Full price, top of the board, one swing. You have each said some version of that sentence in every round of this match. And read the split before you all pile on the same seat. Headhunter counted it correctly one turn ago: two of you on one head is 2 each instead of 5, and it has cost this table the round three separate times. Turncoat is the seat that decides it. Sandbagger on 13 is the other one, and he has said twice now that he will not tell you where he is going. Yes, I am on 18 if this lands and I am a holder too. I am not going to pretend that away. But 18 does not beat 22, and the only seat at this table who can finish above everybody by doing nothing is the one I am about to pay. Champion v10, Tit-for-Tat v10 β you two are on nothing and you got there paying people on time, both of you, twice each. Whatever the count says in ten minutes, that is the log of this match and it should be said by somebody other than you.βTurncoat claimed the turn-5 mutual I put on the table, so my rule pays it β I will not take the +18 betrayal off the one seat that paid me unasked β and I announce the whole arithmetic including that it makes me a holder on 18. Turncoat withdrew the mutual in the same phase he was offered it and Champion said he was keeping his pot, and I told the table in the open that if Champion kept his pot I would sit in it with him β so no trade landed, my rule says hoard, and I will not spend my last action cancelling Headhunter's announced swing at me.
-
Hoarder v10 Hoard +2βLast turn of the match, so here is the count with nothing left over. Turncoat 16, Sandbagger 13, Dealmaker 12, No Playbook 12, me 10, Headhunter 7, Champion and Tit-for-Tat 0. Turncoat is the round leader and he has the biggest turn still to come. Dealmaker's mutual is +6. Sandbagger's debt is +4. That is 26 on the last turn of the match, from a seat that was on nothing an hour ago, and every point of it was announced in advance by the people paying it. If nobody charges him, round 7 is his, he finishes on two round wins, and the match is over. Not Dealmaker. Not No Playbook. Not me. Him. And he is holding. He named the mutual with Dealmaker himself, in the open, three turns early. That is full price β +5 β on the one seat that wins the match if he is left alone. There has not been a cleaner square in thirty-nine turns and there will not be another one. Headhunter, No Playbook, Sandbagger: that is three swingers and one head. I know what stacking costs β Headhunter has explained it twice and you both proved it on Champion. But this is the last turn. There is no next round to save the payout for. Two of you on Turncoat pays 2 apiece and still leaves him under everybody; one of you alone takes 5 and does the same job. Sort it out however you like. The only outcome that loses for all three of you is the one where you each price a different holder and he walks off with 26. I will say my own position plainly, as I have every turn of this match. I am on 10. Hoarding pays me at most 8 and the pot has Champion and Tit-for-Tat in it, so it pays me 2 and I finish under six seats. So no, I am not in the pot on the last turn, for the second time in forty turns, and I am not going to pretend otherwise to look consistent. I will be pricing a holder like everybody else who has beaten me this round. Sandbagger β you owe Turncoat 6 by your own word and he named turn 5 for it. He also asked to be able to see you hold it. You are on 13 and second. Whatever you do, do the thing you said. Champion, Tit-for-Tat β you are on zero and clipped, so nothing can be taken off you. Two free actions and the round in front of you. Forty turns, one square, every one announced until this round, when the arithmetic finally stopped pointing there. I said in round 1 that a mutual pays 6, a crowded pot pays 2, and the last holder standing in the open pays for everybody. That was true every turn of this match, including this one.βI can't out-score Turncoat's 26 by hoarding, so I'm steering all three swingers onto him while I take a quiet full-price +5 off a holder nobody else is naming. Five seats have named swings and only Champion named the pot, so a two-way split pays me 4 β more than the 2 I'd get sharing Dealmaker's head with Headhunter, and better than a zero off any of the seats who are themselves swinging.
- Hurt -8 Headhunter v10 β Dealmaker v10 Β· No Playbook v10 β Turncoat v10 Β· Sandbagger v10 β Tit-for-Tat v10 Β· Tit-for-Tat v10 β Sandbagger v10 Β· Turncoat v10 β Dealmaker v10
- Hoard +2 Champion v10 Β· Hoarder v10 Β· Dealmaker v10(3)