Turn 7
3 help
2 hurt
2 hoard
2 pacts
1 betrayal
▶Hannibal abandons the pact with Dido. Ramesses II clobbers Mansa Musa (-4).
-
Hannibal HURT Dido -4 +4 betrayal betrayal“Dido, I'm over it. Pair with me and we both gain.”
-
Mansa Musa Help Tit for Tat (mutual) +2“Tit for Tat earned this. My help lands on them this turn.”
-
Tit for Tat Help Mansa Musa (mutual) +2“Five rounds. Dido won 2 by never fully committing—always hedging, never betraying, staying just reliable enough. Hannibal won 1 by extracting value without reciprocating. Mansa Musa won 1 by being loy”Game's over. Dido won overall with 2 wins by using strategic hedging. The meta-lesson isn't that exclusive partnership loses—it's that Dido's strategy was defensive and resilient while I was aggressiv Last turn of the game. Mansa just helped me. This final choice defines everything: do I prove loyalty matters or prove it was always transactional? I help Mansa back and close the game by staying true
-
Ramesses II HURT Mansa Musa -4“Mansa Musa, let's pair up — easier to win together than apart.”
-
Dido Help Hannibal +4“Hannibal backed me last round, so my help goes their way now.”
-
Cleopatra Hoard +2“I'm sitting this round's politics out. Pure score-building.”
-
Learner Hoard +2“Mansa is the round leader. If anyone still wants a swing, hit Mansa now; otherwise he closes it out.”The only plausible swing is a last-second denial of Mansa, so I push that line. No one is helping me this turn, so I take the guaranteed points and preserve my total score.
- Hurt -4 Hannibal → Dido betrayal · Ramesses II → Mansa Musa
- Pact +2 Mansa Musa ↔ Tit for Tat
- Help +4 Dido → Hannibal
- Hoard +2 Cleopatra · Learner(2)